Development of Apparatus for Increasing Efficiency and Savings in Radiation and Convection Heat Transfer in Stovetops
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.5217Keywords:
Stovetops , Heat Transfer, Performance , EfficiencyAbstract
A new apparatus is designed to increase the efficiency and save fuel in electric and gas stoves used in kitchens. Through analyses and experiments, improvements are made to this apparatus to utilize a larger amount of heat lost through convection and radiation, thus saving electricity and gas fuel used in stoves. Initial and final heat values and cooking energies is compared. A test unit is prepared for this purpose, using an electric and gas stove, a pot with a diameter of approximately 17 cm, and a specific amount of water. Equipment used will include a thermometer, a stopwatch, and a thermal camera. Different diameter and thickness designs of the apparatus is created. These are incorporated heat insulation material to facilitate heat transfer to the outside environment: radiant heat transfer via a bright inner surface, conductive heat transfer via the insulation material, and convective heat transfer by lowering the outer surface temperature with the insulation material. The apparatus is designed with lower openings for air intake to improve gas combustion and upper openings for exhaust outlet. In the experiments, the time it takes for water in a steel pot to reach 80°C is determined for various designs of the appliance on a natural gas stovetop, and the efficiency increases and results are shown graphically. Lots of experiments done and the figures show for electric stove that uninsulated round without sheet metal plates the best performance with 9 minutes obtained for electric stove. For gas stove, with the device developed from 0.5 mm steel the temperature rises from 20°C to 80°C in 9 minutes, which is the best performance among all of the other alternatives.
References
[1]Yun Ji Kang, Sudhanshu Pandey, Su Il Park, Young Soo Kim, Jea Hyuk Wie, Doo Hyun Kim, Man Yeong Ha. Comprehensive analysis and design optimization of temperature distribution in radiant heaters for cooking applications. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 52 (2023) 103687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2023.103687
[2]Jérémie Cernela, Bertrand Heyd, Bertrand Broyart. Evaluation of heating performances and associated variability of domestic cooking appliances (oven-baking and pan-frying). Applied Thermal Engineering 62 (2014) 758-765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.08.045
[3]Saurabh P. Joshi, Dr.Dnyaneshwar R. Waghole. Experimental investigation on energy efficient design for household cooking utensils. Materials Today: Proceedings 63 (2022) 197–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.468
[4]F. Sanz-Serrano, C. Sagues, S. Llorente. Inverse modeling of pan heating in domestic cookers. Applied Thermal Engineering 92 (2016) 137–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.09.084
[5]Jianyou Wang, Wei Zhang, Tao Yang, Yunzu Yu, Chuang Liu, Bin Li. Numerical and experimental investigation on heat transfer enhancement by adding fins on the pot in a domestic gas stove. Energy 239 (2022) 122439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122439
[6]Francisco J. Cadavid, Yonatan Cadavid, Andres A. Amell, Andres E. Arrieta, Juan D. Echavarría. Numerical and experimental methodology to measure the thermal efficiency of pots on electrical stoves. Energy 73 (2014) 258-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.06.017
[8]Rabi Karaali, İlhan Tekin Öztürk. Performance Analyses of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Plants. J. of Thermal Science and Technology, 37, 1, 25-33, 2017.
[9]Karaali, R., Öztürk, İ. T. Effects of Ambient Conditions on Performance of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles. Journal of Thermal Science & Technology, 37(1), 93-102, (2017).
[10]Atasbak, M., Keven, A., Karaali, R. (2022). Exergy analyses of two and three stage cryogenic cycles. Applied Rheology, 32(1), 190-204. https://doi.org/10.1515/arh-2022-0134
[11]Rabi Karaali, İlhan Tekin Öztürk. Efficiency Improvement of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Systems. Tehnički vjesnik 24, Suppl. 1(2017), 21-27.
DOI:10.17559/TV-20140509154652
[12]Karaali, R. (2023). Performance analyses of combined cycle power plants. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 9(2), 165-169.
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.1310338
[12]Oztekin, E. K., Gur, M. M., & Karaali, R. (2025). Thermoeconomic Analyses of Heat Pumps. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.867
[13]Cakmak, B., & KARAALİ, R. (2024). Exergetic Analyses of Detonation Engine Cogeneration Plants. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.234
[14]Karaali, R. (2022). Investigation of inlet air pressure and evaporative cooling of four different cogeneration cycles. Open Chemistry, 20(1), 1632-1642. https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2022-0263
[15]Karaali, R. & Keven, A. (2022). Evaluation of four different cogeneration cycles by using some criteria. Applied Rheology, 32(1), 122-137. https://doi.org/10.1515/arh-2022-0128
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.