Performance and Exergy Analyses of GT-MHR Nuclear Cycles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.5214Keywords:
GT-MHR, Exergy, PerformanceAbstract
In this study, the performance and exergy analyses of the GT-MHR type nuclear power plants with high thermal energy were analysed. The GT-MHR (Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor), produces electricity by using helium gas in the Brayton cycle, and utilizes the waste heat of the system with the Rankine cycle. The Brayton cycle allows helium gas to be heated to high temperatures in the reactor core, then converted into mechanical energy by using a gas turbine. This hybrid structures in the designs of GT-MHRs allow the combined use of nuclear and renewable energy sources.It was found that exergy efficiency reached its maximum level between approximately 14,000 - 16,000 kPa. At this point, the exergy losses of this system approach its lowest level and the components reach the most ideal operating conditions. If the system is operated below or above of this value, the total exergy efficiency will decrease. The exergy efficiency, which is initially approximately 74.5% at 500 kPa pump pressure, increases to 75.1% at 1000 kPa pressure level. While the pump pressure at 500 kPa produces a work of approximately 532,000 kW, at 1000 kPa it increases to 560,000 kW. Thus, GT-MHR pioneers the energy technologies of the future by combining both high efficiency and environmental sustainability.
References
[1]Rahim, M. (2011). Gaz türbinli kombine çevrim santral performansının yükseltilmesi. TÜBAV Bilim Dergisi, 4(3), 188-198. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tubav/issue/21524/230958
[2]Karaali, Rabi, Öztürk, İlhan Tekin. (2015). Thermoeconomic Optimization of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Plants. Energy 80 474-485 doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.12.004
[3]Karaali, Rabi, Öztürk, İlhan Tekin. (2015). Thermoeconomic Analyses of Steam Injected Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles” ACTA Physica Polonica A 128 No:2B, p:B279-B281
doi:10.12693/APhysPolA.128.B-279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.128.B-279
[4]Karaali, Rabi (2016). Thermodynamic Analysis of
a Cascade Refrigeration System. Acta Physica
Polonica A, 130(1), 101-106.
Doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.130.101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.130.101
[5]Keven, Arzu, Karaali, Rabi. Investigation of an Alternative Fuel for Diesel Engines. ACTA Physica Polonica A 128 (2015) No:2B, p:B282-B285, doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.128.B-282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.128.B-282
[6]Cakmak, B., Karaali, R. (2024). Exergetic Analyses of Detonation Engine Cogeneration Plants. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.234
[7]Mahmoudi, S., & Yari, M. (2011). A thermodynamic study of waste heat recovery from GT-MHR using organic Rankine cycles. Springer, 47, 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-010-0698-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-010-0698-z
[8]Rogalev, A., Rogalev, N., Kindra, V., Komarov, I., & Zlyvko, O. (2022). Research and development of the combined cycle power plants working on supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Inventions, 7, 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/ inventions7030076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions7030076
[9]Karaali, R. (2022). Investigation of inlet air pressure and evaporative cooling of four different cogeneration cycles. Open Chemistry, 20(1), 1632-1642. https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2022-0263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2022-0263
[10]Karaali, R. & Keven, A. (2022). Evaluation of four different cogeneration cycles by using some criteria. Applied Rheology, 32(1), 122-137. https://doi.org/10.1515/arh-2022-0128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/arh-2022-0128
[11]Rashidi, M, M., & Habibzade, A. (2016). Thermodynamic analysis of different working fluids used in organic Rankine cycle for recovering waste heat from GT-MHR. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 11(1) 121 – 135.
[12]Wang, D., Khalatov, A., Shi-Ju, E., Donyk, T., & Shikhabutinova, O. (2023) Thermodynamics of GT-MHR-250 modular nuclear plant with helium reactor and gas turbine based on the complex Brayton cycle. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 39, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2023.101686 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2023.101686
[13]Tao, H., Singh, K, P., Ghodratallah, P., Sh.Majdi, H., Eldin, M, S., Sohail, M., Abd El-Selam, N, M., & El-Shafai, W. (2023). Thermal energy recovery from a Brayton cycle nuclear power plant for efficiency improvement via compressor inlet cooling: Thermoeconomic optimization. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 52,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2023.103734 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2023.103734
[14]Rabi Karaali, İlhan Tekin Öztürk. Performance Analyses of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Plants. J. of Thermal Science and Technology, 37, 1, 25-33, (2017).
[15]Karaali, R., Öztürk, İ. T. Effects of Ambient Conditions on Performance of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles. Journal of Thermal Science & Technology, 37(1), 93-102, (2017).
[16]Rabi Karaali, İlhan Tekin Öztürk. Efficiency Improvement of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Systems. Tehnički vjesnik 24, Suppl. 1(2017), 21-27.
DOI:10.17559/TV-20140509154652
[17]Karaali, Rabi (2016). Exergy Analysis of a Combined Power and Cooling Cycle. Acta Physica Polonica A, 130(1), 209-213.,
Doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.130.209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.130.209
[18]Atasbak, M., Keven, A., Karaali, R. (2022). Exergy analyses of two and three stage cryogenic cycles. Applied Rheology, 32(1), 190-204. https://doi.org/10.1515/arh-2022-0134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/arh-2022-0134
[19]Karaali Rabi, Öztürk, İ. T. (2017). Efficiency improvement of gas turbine cogeneration systems. Tehnicki vjesnik - Technical Gazette, 24(Supplement 1), 21-27. Doi: 10.17559/TV-20140509154652 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20140509154652
[20]Karaali, R. (2023). Performance analyses of combined cycle power plants. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 9(2), 165-169. https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.1310338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.1310338
[21]Karaali Rabi, Öztürk, İ. T.(2016). Thermodynamic Optimization of a Zero CO2 Emission Cogeneration Cycle. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 25(12a), 5729-5738.
[22]Karaali Rabi, Öztürk, İ. T. (2015). Thermoeconomic optimization of gas turbine cogeneration plants. Energy, 80, 474-485.
Doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.12.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.12.004
[23]Oztekin, E. K., Gur, M. M., & Karaali, R. (2025). Thermoeconomic Analyses of Heat Pumps. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Enginee DOI: https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.867
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
