Explainability and Trust in Generative AI–Driven Customer Workflows: Methods for Responsible Enterprise Adoption

Authors

  • Aditya Pothukuchi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.5051

Keywords:

Generative Artificial Intelligence, Explainable AI, Enterprise Customer Workflows, Human-In-The-Loop Oversight, Responsible AI Adoption

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence is increasingly embedded within enterprise customer relationship management workflows to automate communication, summarize interaction histories, and support consequential business decisions. While these capabilities deliver substantial productivity benefits, the opaque reasoning processes of large language models introduce significant risks related to trust, accountability, and regulatory compliance in high-stakes operational contexts such as sales forecasting, customer support, and contractual negotiations. Existing explainable AI literature has concentrated predominantly on predictive systems, leaving a methodological gap for organizations seeking to deploy generative AI responsibly in business-critical environments. This article proposes a comprehensive framework for explainability and trust in generative AI–driven enterprise customer workflows, introducing multi-level technical mechanisms including prompt lineage tracking, decision rationale generation, confidence scoring, and human-verifiable evidence extraction to render generative outputs auditable and interpretable at operational scale. A risk-stratified trust taxonomy is developed to classify workflow actions by consequence severity and required oversight, enabling adaptive human-in-the-loop intervention proportionate to operational risk. The framework further incorporates bias monitoring, hallucination detection, and immutable audit logging to support ethical and compliant operations within enterprise software infrastructure. Integration is demonstrated within a Salesforce-based CRM environment through a secure model gateway and policy enforcement architecture. Experimental deployment in an enterprise customer service context confirms that explanation provision improves user trust calibration, reduces escalation frequency, and decreases response rework compared to opaque automation conditions. Compliance maintenance is validated through traceable execution records satisfying enterprise data governance audit requirements. The article establishes one of the earliest systematic treatments of explainability designed specifically for generative AI in enterprise software, offering actionable technical and governance guidance for organizations pursuing trustworthy automation in consequential customer workflow contexts. Future directions address framework scalability, cross-platform generalization, and alignment with evolving regulatory compliance obligations under instruments including the EU AI Act.

References

[1] McKinsey & Company, "The economic potential of generative AI: The next productivity frontier," McKinsey Digital, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/mckinsey%20digital/our%20insights/the%20economic%20potential%20of%20generative%20ai%20the%20next%20productivity%20frontier/the-economic-potential-of-generative-ai-the-next-productivity-frontier.pdf

[2] Scott M. Lundberg, Su-In Lee, "A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions," NeurIPS Proceedings, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/8a20a8621978632d76c43dfd28b67767-Abstract.html

[3] Marco Tulio Ribeiro et al., "'Why Should I Trust You?': Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier," ACM Digital Library, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2939672.2939778

[4] European Parliament and Council of the European Union, "Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonized rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act)," Official Journal of the European Union, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32024R1689

[5] Patrick Lewis et al., "Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks," (NeurIPS 2020). [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/6b493230205f780e1bc26945df7481e5-Abstract.html

[6] Ben Shneiderman, “Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy," International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10447318.2020.1741118

[7] Maranke Wieringa, "What to account for when accounting for algorithms: a systematic literature review on algorithmic accountability," ACM Digital Library, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3351095.3372833

[8] John D. Lee, Katrina A. See, "Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance," Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2004. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392

[9] Q. Vera Liao and Jennifer Wortman Vaughan,, "AI Transparency in the Age of LLMs: A Human-Centered Research Roadmap," Harvard Data Science Review, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/aelql9qy/release/2

[10] Rishi Bommasani et al., "On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models," arXiv preprint, arXiv:2108.07258, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07258

Downloads

Published

2026-03-15

How to Cite

Aditya Pothukuchi. (2026). Explainability and Trust in Generative AI–Driven Customer Workflows: Methods for Responsible Enterprise Adoption. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.5051

Issue

Section

Research Article