Clinical Safety During Intrahospital Transport of Unstable Emergency Patients for Diagnostic Imaging: Interdisciplinary Roles of Nurses, Radiology Staff, Health Assistants, and Emergency Teams
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4949Keywords:
Intrahospital transport, Critical care, Patient safety, Interdisciplinary collaboration, Emergency nursing; Radiology, Health assistantsAbstract
Intrahospital transport of unstable emergency patients for diagnostic imaging presents numerous challenges that necessitate a coordinated interdisciplinary approach to ensure clinical safety. In this complex scenario, nurses play a pivotal role in assessing the patient’s stability, communicating critical information about the patient's condition, and preparing them for transport. They are responsible for monitoring vital signs and managing any immediate interventions required during movement. Radiology staff are equally crucial, as they must be prepared to accommodate the patient's specific imaging needs while ensuring the appropriate protocols are followed. Collaboration with health assistants further supports this process, ensuring that all necessary equipment and supplies are available and that the transport pathway is clear and safe. This seamless teamwork is essential for mitigating the risks associated with patient transport, as any delay or oversight can have severe consequences for unstable patients. Moreover, emergency teams serve as the backbone of this interdisciplinary effort, providing specialized care and rapid response capabilities throughout the transport process. Their expertise is indispensable in making real-time decisions about the patient's needs, which may change suddenly during transit. Communication among all team members—nurses, radiology staff, health assistants, and emergency personnel—is critical, fostering a shared understanding of each patient's unique needs and circumstances. Regular interdisciplinary training and simulation exercises can enhance this coordination, ensuring that all parties are prepared for the complexities of intrahospital transport. Ultimately, by recognizing and respecting the distinct roles of each discipline, healthcare providers can enhance clinical safety and improve outcomes for unstable emergency patients undergoing diagnostic imaging.
References
1. Brunsveld-Reinders AH, Arbous MS, Kuiper SG, et al. A comprehensive method to develop a checklist to increase safety of intra-hospital transport of critically ill patients. Crit Care 2015;19:214.
2. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 2009;360:491–9.
3. Faiella G, Parand A, Franklin BD, et al. Expanding healthcare failure mode and effect analysis: a composite proactive risk analysis approach. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2018;169:117–26.
4. Stevenson VW, Haas CF, Wahl WL. Intrahospital transport of the adult mechanically ventilated patient. Respir Care Clin N Am 2002;8:1–35.
5. de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, et al. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:216–23.
6. Comeau OY, Armendariz-Batiste J, Woodby SA. Safety first! using a checklist for intrafacility transport of adult intensive care patients. Crit Care Nurse 2015;35:16–25.
7. Cronrath P, Lynch TW, Gilson LJ, et al. Pca oversedation: application of healthcare failure mode effect (HFMEA) analysis. Nurs Econ 2011;29:79.
8. Ehrenwerth J, Sorbo S, Hackel A. Transport of critically ill adults. Crit Care Med 1986;14:543–7.
9. Shaw R, Drever F, Hughes H, et al. Adverse events and near miss reporting in the NHS. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:279–83.
10. Bérubé M, Bernard F, Marion H, et al. Impact of a preventive programme on the occurrence of incidents during the transport of critically ill patients. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2013;29:9–19.
11. Marx G, Vangerow B, Hecker H, et al. Predictors of respiratory function deterioration after transfer of critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 1998;24:1157–62.
12. Tague NR. The quality toolbox. ASQ Press, 2005.
13. Benneyan JC. Number-between g-type statistical quality control charts for monitoring adverse events. Health Care Manag Sci 2001;4:305–18.
14. Høyer CB, Christensen EF, Eika B. Standards of resuscitation during inter-hospital transportation: the effects of structured team briefing or guideline review - a randomised, controlled simulation study of two micro-interventions. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2011;19:15.
15. Chandonnet CJ, Kahlon PS, Rachh P, et al. Health care failure mode and effect analysis to reduce NICU line-associated bloodstream infections. Pediatrics 2013;131:e1961–9.
16. Johnston M, Arora S, Anderson O, et al. Escalation of care in surgery: a systematic risk assessment to prevent avoidable harm in hospitalized patients. Ann Surg 2015;261:831–8.
17. Papson JPN, Russell KL, Taylor DM. Unexpected events during the intrahospital transport of critically ill patients. Acad Emerg Med 2007;14:574–7.
18. Voigt LP, Pastores SM, Raoof ND, et al. Review of a large clinical series: intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: outcomes, timing, and patterns. J Intensive Care Med 2009;24:108–15.
19. Institute for Healthcare Improvement Qi essentials toolkit: failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) tool, 2017.
20. Davidson LA, Utarnachitt RB, Mason A, et al. Development and testing of a neonatal intubation checklist for an air medical transport team. Air Med J 2018;37:41–5.
21. Venkataraman ST, Orr RA. Intrahospital transport of critically ill patients. Crit Care Clin 1992;8:525–31.
22. Lovell MA, Mudaliar MY, Klineberg PL. Intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: complications and difficulties. Anaesth Intensive Care 2001;29:400–5.
23. Rah J-E, Manger RP, Yock AD, et al. A comparison of two prospective risk analysis methods: traditional FMEA and a modified healthcare FMEA. Med Phys 2016;43:6347–53.
24. Knight PH, Maheshwari N, Hussain J, et al. Complications during intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: focus on risk identification and prevention. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2015;5:256.
25. Mullan PC, Macias CG, Hsu D, et al. A novel briefing checklist at shift handoff in an emergency department improves situational awareness and safety event identification. Pediatr Emerg Care 2015;31:231–8.
26. DeRosier J, Stalhandske E, Bagian JP, et al. Using health care failure mode and effect analysis: the Va national center for patient safety's prospective risk analysis system. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2002;28:248–67.
27. Runciman W, Hibbert P, Thomson R, et al. Towards an international classification for patient safety: key concepts and terms. Int J Qual Health Care 2009;21:18–26.
28. Parand A, Faiella G, Franklin BD, et al. A prospective risk assessment of informal carers' medication administration errors within the domiciliary setting. Ergonomics 2018;61:104–21.
29. Deandrea S, Tidone E, Bellini A, et al. Implementation of failure mode and effects analysis to the specimens flow in a population-based colorectal cancer screening programme using immunochemical faecal occult blood tests: a quality improvement project in the Milan colorectal cancer screening programme. BMJ Open Qual 2018;7:e000299.
30. Warren J, Fromm RE, Orr RA, et al. Guidelines for the inter- and intrahospital transport of critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2004;32:256–62.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
