Impact of Operating Room and Anesthesia Technicians’ Coordination on Surgical Team Performance and Operating Room Efficiency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4693Keywords:
Operating Room Technician, Anesthesia Technician, Coordination, Surgical Team Performance, Operating Room Efficiency, CommunicationAbstract
The coordination between Operating Room Technicians (ORTs) and Anesthesia Technicians (ATs) serves as a critical linchpin for the entire surgical ecosystem, directly determining both the safety climate and operational throughput of the operating room. Their specialized, interdependent roles—the ORT managing the sterile surgical process and the AT ensuring physiological stability—create a vital interface where seamless collaboration enhances team communication, builds shared situational awareness, and establishes robust error-trapping mechanisms. This synergy translates into tangible gains in efficiency by optimizing preoperative setups, minimizing intraoperative delays, and accelerating turnover times, thereby maximizing the use of costly OR resources. Ultimately, investing in and strengthening this specific technical partnership is not merely an operational concern but a foundational strategy for building high-reliability surgical teams capable of delivering superior patient outcomes consistently.
References
[1] Macki M, Fakih M, Kandagatla P, et al. The Impact of Different Postgraduate Year Training in Neurosurgery Residency on 30-Day Return to Operating Room: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Study. World Neurosurgery. 2018;114:e70–e76. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.068.
[2] Bath MF, Awopetu AI, Stather PW, et al. The Impact of Operating Surgeon Experience, Supervised Trainee vs. Trained Surgeon, in Vascular Surgery Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;58:292–298. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.03.029.
[3] Nasri B, Saxe J. Impact of Residents on Safety Outcomes in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 2019;43:3013–3018. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05141-5.
[4] Lear R, Godfrey AD, Riga C, et al. The Impact of System Factors on Quality and Safety in Arterial Surgery: A Systematic Review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;54:79–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.03.014.
[5] Cooper WO, Spain DA, Guillamondegui O, et al. Association of Coworker Reports About Unprofessional Behavior by Surgeons With Surgical Complications in Their Patients. JAMA Surg. 2019;154:828–834. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1738.
[6] Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850.
[7] Xu R, Carty MJ, Orgill DP, et al. The teaming curve: a longitudinal study of the influence of surgical team familiarity on operative time. Ann Surg. 2013;258:953–957. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182864ffe.
[8] Kazaure HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA. The resident as surgeon: an analysis of ACS-NSQIP. J Surg Res. 2012;178:126–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.12.033.
[9] Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.
[10] Vincent C, Moorthy K, Sarker SK, et al. Systems approaches to surgical quality and safety: from concept to measurement. Ann Surg. 2004;239:475–482. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000118753.22830.41.
[11] Carter JM, Riley C, Ananth A, et al. Improving outcomes in a high-output pediatric otolaryngology practice. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78:2229–2233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.10.018.
[12] Kurmann A, Keller S, Tschan-Semmer F, et al. Impact of team familiarity in the operating room on surgical complications. World J Surg. 2014;38:3047–3052. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2680-2.
[13] Moris DN, Linos D. Music meets surgery: two sides to the art of “healing”. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:719–723. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2525-8.
[14] Maruthappu M, Duclos A, Zhou CD, et al. The impact of team familiarity and surgical experience on operative efficiency: a retrospective analysis. J R Soc Med. 2016;109:147–153. doi: 10.1177/0141076816634317.
[15] Wu J-M, Yen H-H, Ho T-W, et al. The effect of performing two pancreatoduodenectomies by a single surgical team in one day on surgeons and patient outcomes. HPB (Oxford) 2020;22:1185–1190. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.11.004.
[16] Gillespie BM, Gillespie J, Boorman RJ, et al. The Impact of Robotic-Assisted Surgery on Team Performance: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review. Hum Factors. 2020;18720820928624.
[17] Sacks GD, Shannon EM, Dawes AJ, et al. Teamwork, communication and safety climate: a systematic review of interventions to improve surgical culture. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24:458–467. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003764.
[18] Yamaguchi JT, Garcia RM, Cloney MB, et al. Impact of resident participation on outcomes following lumbar fusion: An analysis of 5655 patients from the ACS-NSQIP database. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;56:131–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.06.030.
[19] Healey AN, Olsen S, Davis R, et al. A method for measuring work interference in surgical teams. Cogn Tech Work. 2008;10:305–312.
[20] Ebadi A, Tighe PJ, Zhang L, et al. DisTeam: A decision support tool for surgical team selection. Artif Intell Med. 2017;76:16–26. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2017.02.002.
[21] Nyanchoka L, Tudur-Smith C, Thu VN, et al. A scoping review describes methods used to identify, prioritize and display gaps in health research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;109:99–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.01.005.
[22] Nurok M, Sundt TM, Frankel A. Teamwork and communication in the operating room: relationship to discrete outcomes and research challenges. Anesthesiol Clin. 2011;29:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2010.11.012.
[23] Vashdi DR, Bamberger PA, Erez M. Can Surgical Teams Ever Learn? The Role of Coordination, Complexity, and Transitivity in Action Team Learning. AMJ. 2013;56:945–971. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0501.
[24] Bougie O, Zuckerman SL, Switzer N, et al. Influence of Resident Involvement in Obstetrics and Gynaecology Surgery on Surgical Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40:1170–1177. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.10.035.
[25] Elbardissi AW, Duclos A, Rawn JD, et al. Cumulative team experience matters more than individual surgeon experience in cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:328–333. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.022.
[26] Engelmann CR, Neis JP, Kirschbaum C, et al. A noise-reduction program in a pediatric operation theatre is associated with surgeon’s benefits and a reduced rate of complications: a prospective controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2014;259:1025–1033. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000253.
[27] El Boghdady M, Ewalds-Kvist BM. The influence of music on the surgical task performance: A systematic review. Int J Surg. 2020;73:101–112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.012.
[28] Zheng B, Panton ONM, Al-Tayeb TA. Operative length independently affected by surgical team size: data from 2 Canadian hospitals. Can J Surg. 2012;55:371–376. doi: 10.1503/cjs.011311.
[29] Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.
[30] Sevdalis N, Undre S, McDermott J, et al. Impact of intraoperative distractions on patient safety: a prospective descriptive study using validated instruments. World J Surg. 2014;38:751–758. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2315-z.
[31] Panagioti M, Khan K, Keers RN, et al. Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019;366:l4185. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4185.
[32] Gross CE, Chang D, Adams SB, et al. Surgical resident involvement in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;23:261–267. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.08.001.
[33] Stepaniak PS, Heij C, Buise MP, et al. Bariatric surgery with operating room teams that stayed fixed during the day: a multicenter study analyzing the effects on patient outcomes, teamwork and safety climate, and procedure duration. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:1384–1392. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31826c7fa6.
[34] Koch A, Burns J, Catchpole K, et al. Associations of workflow disruptions in the operating room with surgical outcomes: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020;29:1033–1045. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010639.
[35] Etherington N, Larrigan S, Liu H, et al. Measuring the teamwork performance of operating room teams: a systematic review of assessment tools and their measurement properties. J Interprof Care. 2021;35(1):37–4.
[36] Murji A, Luketic L, Sobel ML, et al. Evaluating the effect of distractions in the operating room on clinical decision-making and patient safety. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:4499–4504. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4782-4.
[37] Wu WW, Medin C, Bucknor A, et al. Evaluating the Impact of Resident Participation and the July Effect on Outcomes in Autologous Breast Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;81:156–162. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001518.
[38] Gjeraa K, Spanager L, Konge L, et al. Non-technical skills in minimally invasive surgery teams: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:5185–5199. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4890-1.
[39] Schrand KV, Hussain LR, Dunki-Jacobs EM, et al. Outcomes associated with resident involvement in ventral hernia repair: A population based study using the NSQIP database. Am J Surg. 2018;216:923–925. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.03.014.
[40] Salm L, Chapalley D, Perrodin SF, et al. Impact of changing the surgical team for wound closure on surgical site infection: A matched case-control study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0241712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241712.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
