Role of Radiologic Technologists in Image Quality Optimization and Repeat Imaging Reduction in Diagnostic Radiology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4678Keywords:
Radiologic Technologist, Image Quality Optimization, Repeat Imaging Reduction, Patient Positioning, Exposure Factor Selection, Diagnostic RadiologyAbstract
Radiologic technologists serve as the essential frontline operators and decision-makers in diagnostic imaging, directly responsible for producing high-quality images while minimizing avoidable repeat examinations. Their role encompasses a sophisticated integration of technical expertise and patient-centered care. Through precise selection of exposure parameters, accurate patient positioning, and effective communication, they establish the foundational conditions for diagnostic accuracy. By mastering advanced imaging technology and adhering to optimized protocols, they harness tools like exposure indices and dose modulation to balance image quality with patient safety. Furthermore, their diligent execution of quality assurance tests and active participation in repeat analysis programs foster a culture of continuous improvement and radiation safety. Ultimately, the technologist’s judgment at every step—from patient assessment to image processing—is the critical determinant in achieving diagnostic efficacy, enhancing patient outcomes by reducing unnecessary radiation exposure, decreasing anxiety, and improving departmental workflow efficiency through first-time imaging success.
References
[1] Silva Almeida L, Rodrigues Franco AH. Critical thinking: its relevance for education in a shifting society. Rev Psicol. 2011;29:1–25.
[2] Grenier PA, Ayobi A, Quenet S, et al. Deep learning-based algorithm for automatic detection of pulmonary embolism in chest CT angiograms. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023;13:1–13.
[3] Smith E, Boscak A. A virtual emergency: learning lessons from remote medical student education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerg Radiol. 2021;28:445–452.
[4] Weiss AJ, Reid LD, Barrett ML. Overview of emergency department visits related to injuries, by cause of injury, 2017. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs [Internet]. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2020.
[5] Seyam M, Weikert T, Sauter A, Brehm A, Psychogios MN, Blackham KA. Utilization of artificial intelligence-based intracranial hemorrhage detection on emergent noncontrast CT images in clinical workflow. Radiol Artif Intell. 2022;4:0.
[6] Restauri N, Lind KE, Webb N, Ariefdjohan M, Kondo K, Dodd G 3rd. Medical student satisfaction and performance using an innovative radiology education laboratory. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14:404–408.
[7] Cabitza F, Rasoini R, Gensini GF. Unintended consequences of machine learning in medicine. JAMA. 2017;318:517–518.
[8] Ghozy S, Azzam AY, Kallmes KM, et al. The diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence algorithms for identifying M2 segment middle cerebral artery occlusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neuroradiol. 2023;50:449–454.
[9] McLouth J, Elstrott S, Chaibi Y, Quenet S, Chang PD, Chow DS, Soun JE. Validation of a deep learning tool in the detection of intracranial hemorrhage and large vessel occlusion. Front Neurol. 2021;12:1–12.
[10] Pickhardt PJ. Value-added opportunistic CT screening: state of the art. Radiology. 2022;303:241–254.
[11] Hussein SE. Picture archiving and communication system analysis and deployment. IEEE. 2009;11:520–525.
[12] de Zwart AD, Beeres FJ, Rhemrev SJ, Bartlema K, Schipper IB. Comparison of MRI, CT and bone scintigraphy for suspected scaphoid fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42:725–731.
[13] Karamchandani RR, Helms AM, Satyanarayana S, et al. Automated detection of intracranial large vessel occlusions using Viz.ai software: experience in a large, integrated stroke network. Brain Behav. 2023;13:0.
[14] Arenson RL, Andriole KP, Avrin DE, Gould RG. Computers in imaging and health care: now and in the future. J Digit Imaging. 2000;13:145–156.
[15] Rowell C, Sebro R. Who will get paid for artificial intelligence in medicine? Radiol Artif Intell. 2022;4:1–5.
[16] Harackiewicz JM, Smith JL, Priniski SJ. Interest matters: the importance of promoting interest in education. Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci. 2016;3:220–227.
[17] Brejnebøl MW, Nielsen YW, Taubmann O, Eibenberger E, Müller FC. Artificial Intelligence based detection of pneumoperitoneum on CT scans in patients presenting with acute abdominal pain: a clinical diagnostic test accuracy study. Eur J Radiol. 2022;150:1–9.
[18] Hood MN, Scott H. Introduction to picture archive and communication systems. J Radiol Nurs. 2006;25:1–9.
[19] Arendts G, Manovel A, Chai A. Cranial CT interpretation by senior emergency department staff. Australas Radiol. 2003;47:368–374.
[20] Salastekar NV, Maxfield C, Hanna TN, Krupinski EA, Heitkamp D, Grimm LJ. Artificial intelligence/machine learning education in radiology: multi-institutional survey of radiology residents in the United States. Acad Radiol. 2023;30:1481–1487.
[21] Williams SM, Connelly DJ, Wadsworth S, Wilson DJ. Radiological review of accident and emergency radiographs: a 1-year audit. Clin Radiol. 2000;55:861–865.
[22] Auffermann WF, Henry TS, Little BP, Tigges S, Tridandapani S. Simulation for teaching and assessment of nodule perception on chest radiography in nonradiology health care trainees. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12:1215–1222.
[23] Wei CJ, Tsai WC, Tiu CM, Wu HT, Chiou HJ, Chang CY. Systematic analysis of missed extremity fractures in emergency radiology. Acta Radiol. 2006;47:710–717.
[24] Brombal L, Arfelli F, Delogu P, et al. Image quality comparison between a phase-contrast synchrotron radiation breast CT and a clinical breast CT: a phantom based study. Sci Rep. 2019;9:17778.
[25] Selvarajan SK, Levin DC, Parker L. The increasing use of emergency department imaging in the united states: is it appropriate? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;213:0–4.
[26] Sung J, Park S, Lee SM, et al. Added value of deep learning-based detection system for multiple major findings on chest radiographs: a randomized crossover study. Radiology. 2021;299:450–459.
[27] Kuo RY, Harrison C, Curran TA, et al. Artificial intelligence in fracture detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2022;304:50–62.
[28] Renninger KA, Hidi SE. Interest development and learning. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and Learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2019:265–290.
[29] Alvarez A, Gold GE, Tobin B, Desser TS. Software tools for interactive instruction in radiologic anatomy. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:512–517.
[30] Singh CS, Sethuraman KR, Ehzumalai G, Adkoli BV. Effectiveness of problem-solving exercises in radiology education for undergraduates. Natl Med J India. 2019;32:103–106.
[31] Mulita F, Verras GI, Anagnostopoulos CN, Kotis K. A smarter health through the internet of surgical things. Sensors (Basel) 2022;22:22.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
