Impact of Health Informatics–Supported Medical Secretarial Practices on Clinical Workflow Efficiency and Documentation Accuracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4669Keywords:
Health informatics, medical secretarial practices, clinical workflow efficiency, documentation accuracy, electronic health records (EHR), appointment schedulingAbstract
Health informatics has revolutionized medical secretarial practices by enhancing clinical workflow efficiency and documentation accuracy. The integration of electronic health records (EHRs), digital communication tools, and data management systems allows medical secretaries to streamline administrative tasks, thereby freeing up time for clinical staff to focus on patient care. Automated appointment scheduling, real-time data entry, and the ability to quickly retrieve patient information minimize delays and reduce the risk of clerical errors. This modernization not only expedites the handling of patient data but also fosters a collaborative environment where healthcare professionals can communicate effectively, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes. Furthermore, health informatics enhances the accuracy and reliability of clinical documentation. With standardized templates and pre-populated data fields, medical secretaries can ensure that patient records are comprehensive and consistent. This accuracy is crucial for maintaining compliance with regulatory standards and for facilitating seamless care transitions. Moreover, the use of decision support tools integrated within EHR systems assists medical secretaries in identifying potential discrepancies or missing information before documentation is finalized. As a result, healthcare providers can trust the integrity of the information at their disposal, leading to informed clinical decision-making and elevated quality of care.
References
1. Baumann LA, Baker J, Elshaug AG. The impact of electronic health record systems on clinical documentation times: A systematic review. Health Policy. 2018;122:827–36.
2. Tubaishat A. The effect of electronic health records on patient safety: A qualitative exploratory study. Informatics for Health and Social Care. 2019;44:79–91.
3. Lakin JR, Isaacs E, Sullivan E, Harris HA, McMahan RD, Sudore RL. Emergency physicians' experience with advance care planning documentation in the electronic medical record: Useful, needed, and elusive. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 2016;19:632–8.
4. Yanamadala S, Morrison D, Curtin C, McDonald K, Hernandez-Boussard T. Electronic health records and quality of care: An observational study modeling impact on mortality, readmissions, and complications. Medicine. 2016;95:e3332.
5. Holmgren AJ, Kuznetsova M, Classen D, Bates DW. Assessing hospital electronic health record vendor performance across publicly reported quality measures. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2021;28:2101–7.
6. Longhurst CA, Davis T, Maneker A, Eschenroeder HC, Jr, Dunscombe R, Reynolds G, et al. Local investment in training drives electronic health record user satisfaction. Applied Clinical Informatics. 2019;10:331–5.
7. Enaizan O, Zaidan AA, Alwi NH, Zaidan BB, Alsalem MA, Albahri OS, et al. Electronic medical record systems: Decision support examination framework for individual, security and privacy concerns using multi-perspective analysis. Health and Technology. 2020;10:795–822.
8. Pan HY, Shaitelman SF, Perkins GH, Schlembach PJ, Woodward WA, et al. Implementing a real-time electronic data capture system to improve clinical documentation in radiation oncology. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2016;13:401–7.
9. Datta SS, Tripathi L, Varghese R, Logan J, Gessler S, Chatterjee S, et al. Pivotal role of families in doctor–patient communication in oncology: A qualitative study of patients, their relatives and cancer clinicians. European Journal of Cancer Care. 2017;26:e12543.
10. Narayanan J, Dobrin S, Choi J, Rubin S, Pham A, Patel V, et al. Structured clinical documentation in the electronic medical record to improve quality and to support practice‐based research in epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2017;58:68–76.
11. Torab-Miandoab A, Samad-Soltani T, Jodati A, Rezaei-Hachesu P. Interoperability of heterogeneous health information systems: A systematic literature review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2023;23:18.
12. Sanderson AL, Burns JP. Clinical documentation for intensivists: The impact of diagnosis documentation. Critical Care Medicine. 2020;48:579–87.
13. Bush RA, Pérez A, Baum T, Etland C, Connelly CD. A systematic review of the use of the electronic health record for patient identification, communication, and clinical support in palliative care. JAMIA Open. 2018;1:294–303.
14. Mathai N, Shiratudin MF, Sohel F. Electronic health record management: Expectations, issues, and challenges. Journal of Health & Medical Informatics. 2017;8:1–5.
15. Janett RS, Yeracaris PP. Electronic medical records in the American health system: Challenges and lessons learned. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva. 2020;25:1293–304.
16. Berdahl CT, Moran GJ, McBride O, Santini AM, Verzhbinsky IA, Schriger DL. Concordance between electronic clinical documentation and physicians’ observed behavior. JAMA Network Open. 2019;2:e1911390.
17. Wurster F, Fütterer G, Beckmann M, Dittmer K, Jaschke J, Köberlein-Neu J, et al. The analyzation of change in documentation due to the introduction of electronic patient records in hospitals—A systematic review. Journal of Medical Systems. 2022;46:54.
18. Daneshkohan A, Alimoradi M, Ahmadi M, Alipour J. Data quality and data use in primary health care: A case study from Iran. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked. 2022;28:100855.
19. Keshta I, Odeh A. Security and privacy of electronic health records: Concerns and challenges. Egyptian Informatics Journal. 2021;22:177–83.
20. Koh J, Ahmed M. Improving clinical documentation: Introduction of electronic health records in paediatrics. BMJ Open Quality. 2021;10:e000918.
21. Scott IA, Pillans PI, Barras M, Morris C. Using EMR-enabled computerized decision support systems to reduce prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications: A narrative review. Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety. 2018;9:559–73.
22. Gill K, Cacciamani G, Nabhani J, Corb J, Buchanan T, Park D, Bhardwaj V, Marwah O, Kim M, Kapoor D, Kutikov A. A Novel Artificial Intelligence Platform to Automate Clinical Consultation Notes and Enhance Diagnostic Efficiency in the Outpatient Clinic: A Multi-Center, Multi-Disciplinary, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. medRxiv. 2023:2023–06.
23. Fujita K, Onishi K, Takemura T, Kuroda T. The improvement of the electronic health record user experience by screen design principles. Journal of Medical Systems. 2020;44:21.
24. Garber L, Gettinger A, Csatari A, Abramson E, Patel V, Malhotra S, et al. Data migration: A thorny issue in electronic health record transitions—case studies and review of the literature. ACI Open. 2020;4:e48–58.
25. Preethi MM. Electronic medical records (EMR) over manual documentation of in-patient records: A scientific insight. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education. 2021;12:3274–85.
26. Samadbeik M, Fatehi F, Braunstein M, Barry B, Saremian M, Kalhor F, et al. Education and training on electronic medical records (EMRs) for health care professionals and students: A scoping review. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2020;142:104238.
27. Moy AJ, Schwartz JM, Chen R, Sadri S, Lucas E, Cato KD, et al. Measurement of clinical documentation burden among physicians and nurses using electronic health records: A scoping review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2021;28:998–1008.
28. Scandurra I, Lyttkens L, Eklund B. Implications of Swedish national regulatory framework of the patient accessible electronic health record. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. 2016;228:695–9.
29. Cao J, Farmer R, Carry PM, Goodfellow M, Gerhardt DC, Scott F, et al. Standardized note templates improve electronic medical record documentation of neurovascular examinations for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures. JBJS Open Access. 2017;2:e0027.
30. Smaradottir BF, Fensli RW. User experiences and satisfaction with an electronic health record system. In: Advances in Usability and User Experience. 2020:73–80.
31. Lemon C, De Ridder M, Khadra M. Do electronic medical records improve advance directive documentation? A systematic review. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. 2019;36:255–63.
32. Zheng K, Ratwani RM, Adler-Milstein J. Studying workflow and workarounds in electronic health record–supported work to improve health system performance. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2020;172:S116–22.
33. Perry MF, Macias C, Chaparro JD, Heacock AC, Jackson K, Bode RS. Improving early discharges with an electronic health record discharge optimization tool. Pediatric Quality and Safety. 2020;5:e301.
34. Mehta R, Radhakrishnan NS, Warring CD, Jain A, Fuentes J, Dolganiuc A, et al. The use of evidence-based, problem-oriented templates as a clinical decision support in an inpatient electronic health record system. Applied Clinical Informatics. 2016;7:790–802.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
