Role of Nurses in Identifying Early Care Escalation Needs

Authors

  • Hind Farhan Hadlan Alenzi
  • Samiyah Dhahawi Alruwaili
  • Shouq Saqer Salem Alruwaili
  • Azizah Maashi Harran Alrowily
  • Abdulaziz Saffaq Munawir Alanzi
  • Nouf Ghayyadh Fahad Alruwaili
  • Basam Maiah M Alhazmi
  • Alia Salim Ayed Alsolabi
  • Albandari Nazal Murdhi Alhazmi
  • Alanazi ,Maha Awadh R
  • Alanood Nasser Alrashidi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4652

Keywords:

Nursing Surveillance, Early Warning Signs, Clinical Judgment, Care Escalation, Rapid Response Systems, Patient Deterioration

Abstract

The registered nurse occupies a unique and indispensable position as the healthcare system's primary sentinel against patient deterioration. Through their constant presence at the bedside, nurses engage in continuous, holistic surveillance that transcends the intermittent collection of vital signs. This role leverages advanced clinical judgment, a skill honed by experience and education, to synthesize objective data with nuanced subjective findings—such as subtle changes in behavior, patient-reported unease, or family concerns. This integration allows nurses to identify subtle deviations from a patient's established baseline, often recognizing the early, insidious signs of complications like sepsis, respiratory distress, or neurological decline long before they reach a critical threshold. Their hands-on, around-the-clock monitoring provides a dynamic and longitudinal view of the patient's condition, making them the most reliable detector of nascent crisis and the essential initiator of the escalation cascade. Upon identifying a potential risk, the nurse's role pivots from detection to action, encompassing structured communication, interprofessional collaboration, and steadfast advocacy. Utilizing frameworks like ISBAR (Identity, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation), nurses translate their concerns into clear, actionable reports to physicians or rapid response teams, thereby bridging the gap between observation and intervention. This process requires both assertiveness to navigate clinical hierarchies and a deep-seated ethical commitment to patient safety. Ultimately, the nurse acts as the patient's guardian, coordinating the initial response and advocating relentlessly for the necessary level of care. Their pivotal function is therefore systemic, transforming individual vigilance into a robust organizational safety net that prevents failure-to-rescue events, improves outcomes, and safeguards patient lives.

References

1. Thursky K, Lingaratnam S, Jayarajan J, et al. Implementation of a whole of hospital sepsis clinical pathway in a cancer hospital: impact on sepsis management, outcomes and costs. BMJ Open Qual . 2018;7:e000355.

2. Tedesco ER, Whiteman K, Heuston M, et al. Interprofessional Collaboration to Improve Sepsis Care and Survival Within a Tertiary Care Emergency Department. J Emerg Nurs. 2017;43:532–8.

3. Boussina A, Shashikumar SP, Malhotra A, et al. Impact of a deep learning sepsis prediction model on quality of care and survival. NPJ Digit Med. 2024;7:14.

4. Mak S, Thomas A. Steps for Conducting a Scoping Review. J Grad Med Educ. 2022;14:565–7.

5. Jacobs JL. Implementation of an Evidence-Based, Nurse-Driven Sepsis Protocol to Reduce Acute Care Transfer Readmissions in the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Setting. Rehabil Nurs. 2020;45:57–70.

6. Westphal GA, Pereira AB, Fachin SM, et al. An electronic warning system helps reduce the time to diagnosis of sepsis. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2018;30:414–22.

7. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47:1181–247.

8. Benson L, Hasenau S, O’Connor N, et al. The impact of a nurse practitioner rapid response team on systemic inflammatory response syndrome outcomes. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2014;33:108–15.

9. Brusco NK, Sykes K, Cheng AC, et al. A state-wide implementation of a whole of hospital sepsis pathway with a mortality based cost-effectiveness analysis from a healthcare sector perspective. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023;3:e0000687.

10. Burkey J, Wood S, Hermon A, et al. Improving outcome of sepsis on the ward: introducing the “Sepsis Six” bundle. Nurs Crit Care. 2019;24:33–9.

11. Cull J, Brevetta R, Gerac J, et al. Epic Sepsis Model Inpatient Predictive Analytic Tool: A Validation Study. Critical Care Explorations. 2023;5:e0941.

12. Lopez-Bushneil K, Demaray WS, Jaco C. Reducing sepsis mortality. Medsurg Nurs. 2014;23:9–14.

13. Presseau J, McCleary N, Lorencatto F, et al. Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour. Implement Sci. 2019;14:102.

14. Roney JK, Whitley BE, Long JD. Implementation of a MEWS-Sepsis screening tool: Transformational outcomes of a nurse-led evidence-based practice project. Nurs Forum. 2020;55:144–8.

15. Campaign SS. History of the suviving sepsis campaign: the society of critical care medicine. [24-Mar-2025]. Available.

16. Taj M, Kassamali SA, Khan Jiwani B, et al. Outcomes of evidence-based modified sepsis protocol in an emergency department in Tanzania. Int Emerg Nurs. 2022;64:101197.

17. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315:801–10.

18. Cranston T, Thompson K, Bowles KH. The Role and Initiatives Led by the Sepsis Coordinator to Improve Sepsis Bundle Compliance and Care Across the Continuum. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2023;35:413–24.

19. Moxham L, McMahon-Parkes K. An evaluation of the impact of advanced nurse practitioner triage and clinical intervention for medically expected patients referred to an acute National Health Service hospital. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29:3679–86.

20. Biederman S, Batheja A, Bednar S, et al. Toward Standardization and High Reliability: Improved Sepsis Screening in Emergency Department Triage Across an Academic Health System. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024;50:809–16.

21. Organisation WH Strengthening the nursing and midwifery agenda globally. 2025

22. Covidence . Covidence. Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation; 2025. Available.

23. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32.

24. Torsvik M, Gustad LT, Mehl A, et al. Early identification of sepsis in hospital inpatients by ward nurses increases 30-day survival. Crit Care. 2016;20:244.

25. Powell ES, Bond WF, Barker LT, et al. In Situ Simulation for Adoption of New Technology to Improve Sepsis Care in Rural Emergency Departments. J Patient Saf. 2022;18:302–9.

26. Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle: 2018 update. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:925–8.

27. Group P Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. 2018

28. Judd WR, Stephens DM, Kennedy CA. Clinical and economic impact of a quality improvement initiative to enhance early recognition and treatment of sepsis. Ann Pharmacother. 2014;48:1269–75.

29. Bruce HR, Maiden J, Fedullo PF, et al. Impact of nurse-initiated ED sepsis protocol on compliance with sepsis bundles, time to initial antibiotic administration, and in-hospital mortality. J Emerg Nurs. 2015;41:130–7.

30. Stellpflug C, Pierson L, Roloff D, et al. Continuous Physiological Monitoring Improves Patient Outcomes. Am J Nurs. 2021;121:40–6.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Hind Farhan Hadlan Alenzi, Samiyah Dhahawi Alruwaili, Shouq Saqer Salem Alruwaili, Azizah Maashi Harran Alrowily, Abdulaziz Saffaq Munawir Alanzi, Nouf Ghayyadh Fahad Alruwaili, … Alanood Nasser Alrashidi. (2024). Role of Nurses in Identifying Early Care Escalation Needs. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4652

Issue

Section

Research Article