Nursing-Led Management of Chronic Diseases in Primary Healthcare

Authors

  • Wadha Radoh Alhazmi
  • Alenez, Latifh Ayad S
  • Refah Asri Matar Alhazmi
  • Hanan Hulayyil Bakheet Alruwaili
  • Rshdah Tawih S Alrwili
  • Mastourah Zaalalhazmi
  • Alanazi, Yusra Salamah T
  • Minaa Mubarak Alhazmy
  • Tahani Margel Othman Alhazmi
  • Munayfah Alturqi Rubayyi Alruwaili
  • Dalal Alzuayli Mulayhan Alanazi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4447

Keywords:

Nursing-led management, chronic diseases, primary healthcare, patient education, interdisciplinary teams

Abstract

Nursing-led management of chronic diseases in primary healthcare offers a holistic approach to patient care, integrating clinical expertise with a focus on patient education and support. Nurses play a vital role in assessing healthcare needs, developing treatment plans, and monitoring patients' progress in managing conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and asthma. By utilizing evidence-based practices and fostering patient engagement, nurses can empower individuals to take control of their health. This approach not only enhances patient outcomes but also alleviates the burden on physicians within the primary care setting, allowing for a more collaborative healthcare experience. Furthermore, the integration of nursing-led care models into primary healthcare systems can lead to improved communication and continuity of care for patients with chronic diseases. Collaborating with interdisciplinary teams, nurses contribute to comprehensive care strategies and can identify potential complications early on, reducing hospital admissions and healthcare costs. By leveraging technology, such as telehealth and electronic health records, nurse-led initiatives can ensure real-time data tracking and facilitate patient follow-up, improving adherence to treatment regimens. Ultimately, nursing-led management serves as a crucial component in creating sustainable, patient-centered healthcare systems addressing the growing incidence of chronic diseases in our populations.

References

1. Agnihothri S, Cui L, Delasay M, et al. The value of mHealth for managing chronic conditions. Health Care Manag Sci 2020;23:185–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-018-9458-2

2. Black S., Fadaak R., Leslie M. Integrating nurse practitioners into primary care: Policy considerations from a Canadian province. BMC Family Practice, 2020;21(1):254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01318-3

3. Fraze T. K., Briggs A. D. M., Whitcomb E. K., Peck K. A., Meara E. Role of nurse practitioners in caring for patients with complex health needs. Medical Care, 2020;58(10):853–860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001364

4. Canada Health Infoway . National survey of Canadian nurses: use of digital health technology in practice. 2020.

5. NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation . Virtual care in practice. n.d.

6. Kwok C, Degen C, Moradi N, et al. Nurse-Led telehealth interventions for symptom management in patients with cancer receiving systemic or radiation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 2022;30:7119–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07052-z

7. Catton H, Iro E. How to reposition the nursing profession for a post-covid age. BMJ 2021:1105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1105

8. Fowler T., Garr D., Mager N. D. P., Stanley J. Enhancing primary care and preventive services through interprofessional practice and education. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 2020;9(1):1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-020-00371-8

9. Flood C. M., Thomas B., McGibbon E. Canada’s primary care crisis: Federal government response. Healthcare Management Forum, 2023;36(5):327–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704231183863

10. Shaw J, Jamieson T, Agarwal P, et al. Virtual care policy recommendations for patient-centred primary care: findings of a consensus policy dialogue using a nominal group technique. J Telemed Telecare 2018;24:608–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X17730444

11. College of Nurses of Ontario. Nurse practitioner. Standards of Practice, 2021;3–6.

12. Heale R., Dahrouge S., Johnston S., Tranmer J. E. Characteristics of nurse practitioner practice in family health teams in Ontario, Canada. Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice, 2018;19(3/4):72–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1527154418792538

13. Mistry SK, Shaw M, Raffan F, et al. Inequity in access and delivery of virtual care interventions: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:9411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159411

14. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (tidier) checklist and guide. BMJ 2014;348:bmj.g1687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1687

15. Imanuel Tonapa S, Inayati A, Sithichoksakulchai S, et al. Outcomes of nurse-led telecoaching intervention for patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Clin Nurs 2022;31:1125–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16025

16. DiCenso A., Bourgeault I., Abelson J., Martin-Misener R., Kaasalainen S., Carter N., Kilpatrick K. Utilization of nurse practitioners to increase patient access to primary healthcare in Canada–thinking outside the box. Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont), 2010;23(Spec No 2010):239–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12927/cjnl.2010.22281

17. Zou P, D’Souza D, Luo Y, et al. Potential effects of virtual interventions for menopause management: a systematic review. Menopause 2022;29:1101–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002020

18. Burdine J. T., Thorne S., Sandu G. Interpretive description: A flexible qualitative methodology for medical education research. Medical Education, 2020;55(3):341–348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14380

19. Jeon E, Park HA. Nursing intervention using smartphone technologies; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015;210:321–5.

20. Gordon K., Gray C. S., Dainty K. N., deLacy J., Seto E. Nurse-led models of care for patients with complex chronic conditions: A scoping review. Nursing Leadership, 2019;32(3):57–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12927/cjnl.2019.25972

21. Heale R., James S., Wenghofer E., Garceau M. L. Nurse practitioner's perceptions of the impact of the nurse practitioner-led clinic model on the quality of care of complex patients. Primary Health Care Research and Development, 2018;19(6):553–560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423617000913

22. Bhatia RS, Chu C, Pang A, et al. Virtual care use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional study. Cmajo 2021;9:E107–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200311

23. Côté N., Freeman A., Jean E., Denis J. L. New understanding of primary health care nurse practitioner role optimisation: The dynamic relationship between the context and work meaning. BMC Health Services Research, 2019;19(1):882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4731-8

24. Grant A., Kontak J., Jeffers E., Lawson B., MacKenzie A., Burge F., Boulos L., Lackie K., Marshall E. G., Mireault A., Philpott S., Sampalli T., Sheppard-LeMoine D., Martin-Misener R. Barriers and enablers to implementing interprofessional primary care teams: A narrative review of the literature using the consolidated framework for implementation research. BMC Primary Care, 2024;25:1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02240-0

25. Azad N, Amos S, Milne K, et al. Telemedicine in a rural memory disorder clinic-remote management of patients with dementia. Can Geriatr J 2012;15:96–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.15.28

26. Keith K. M., Askin D. F. Effective collaboration: The key to better healthcare. Nursing Leadership (1910-622X), 2008;21(2):51–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12927/cjnl.2008.19875

27. Dunn P., Conard S. Chronic care model in research and in practice. International Journal of Cardiology, 2018;258:295–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.01.078

28. Davis SM, Jones A, Jaynes ME, et al. Designing a multifaceted telehealth intervention for a rural population using a model for developing complex interventions in nursing. BMC Nurs 2020;19:9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-0400-9

29. PRISMA-P Group, Moher D, Shamseer L, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015;4:1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

30. Freed J, Lowe C, Flodgren G, et al. Telemedicine: is it really worth it? A perspective from evidence and experience. J Innov Health Inform 2018;25:14–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v25i1.957

31. Chudasama YV, Gillies CL, Zaccardi F, et al. Impact of covid-19 on routine care for chronic diseases: a global survey of views from healthcare professionals. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2020;14:965–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.042

32. Krick T, Huter K, Seibert K, et al. Measuring the effectiveness of digital nursing technologies: development of a comprehensive digital nursing technology outcome framework based on a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2020;20:243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05106-8

33. Zhang Q, Zhang L, Yin R, et al. Effectiveness of telephone-based interventions on health-related quality of life and prognostic outcomes in breast cancer patients and survivors-A meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2018;27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12632

34. Kruse CS, Krowski N, Rodriguez B, et al. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open 2017;7:e016242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016242

35. Cloyd B, Thompson J. Virtual care nursing: the wave of the future. Nurse Lead 2020;18:147–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2019.12.006

36. He Q, Zhao X, Wang Y, et al. Effectiveness of smartphone application-based self-management interventions in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Adv Nurs 2022;78:348–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14993

37. Rutledge CM, Gustin T. Preparing nurses for roles in telehealth: now is the time! Online J Issues Nurs 2021;26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol26No01Man03

38. Luo X, Chen Y, Chen J, et al. Effectiveness of mobile health-based self-management interventions in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 2022;30:2853–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06568-0

39. van Hooft SM, Been-Dahmen JMJ, Ista E, et al. A realist review: what do nurse-led self-management interventions achieve for outpatients with a chronic condition? J Adv Nurs 2017;73:1255–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13189

40. Zaslavsky O, Chu F, Renn BN. Patient digital health technologies to support primary care across clinical contexts: survey of primary care providers, behavioral health consultants, and nurses. JMIR Form Res 2022;6:e32664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/32664

41. Smithson R, Roche E, Wicker C. Virtual models of chronic disease management: lessons from the experiences of virtual care during the COVID-19 response. Aust Health Rev 2021;45:311–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AH20190

Downloads

Published

2024-05-30

How to Cite

Wadha Radoh Alhazmi, Alenez, Latifh Ayad S, Refah Asri Matar Alhazmi, Hanan Hulayyil Bakheet Alruwaili, Rshdah Tawih S Alrwili, Mastourah Zaalalhazmi, … Dalal Alzuayli Mulayhan Alanazi. (2024). Nursing-Led Management of Chronic Diseases in Primary Healthcare. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4447

Issue

Section

Research Article