Clinical Management of Instrument Separation in Root Canal Treatment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4420Keywords:
Instrument separation, root canal treatment, clinical management, endodontic therapy, file breakageAbstract
Instrument separation during root canal treatment is a challenging complication that can hinder successful endodontic therapy. This occurs when a file or another endodontic instrument breaks within the root canal system, creating an obstruction that may impede thorough cleaning and shaping of the canal. Early recognition of an instrument separation is crucial, as it enables clinicians to initiate appropriate management strategies. The clinician must assess the degree of separation, the location of the fractured piece, and whether the canal anatomy allows for potential retrieval or bypass. Techniques such as utilizing ultrasonic instruments, operating microscopes, and specialized retrieval kits are often employed to enhance visibility and facilitate the successful removal of fractured instruments. In certain cases, if retrieval is deemed impossible, the focus may shift towards sealing and managing the inflamed pulpal tissue to prevent further complications. The management of instrument separation also requires a well-thought-out treatment plan, depending on the case's specifics. Options may include non-surgical approaches, such as bypassing the separated instrument to access the apical region or filling around the broken piece, or surgical techniques that may involve apicoectomy. While the prognosis for successful endodontic treatment with instrument separation may be reduced, advancements in endodontic technology and techniques provide clinicians with various tools and methods to improve outcomes. Proper patient communication about the potential risks and uncertainties in achieving a successful treatment outcome is essential. Ultimately, the goal remains to preserve the tooth, relieve discomfort, and maintain the integrity of the surrounding structures, ensuring long-term success in endodontic therapy.
References
1. Ungerechts, C., Bårdsen, A. & Fristad, I. Instrument fracture in root canals - where, why, when and what? a study from a student clinic. Int. Endod. J.47, 183–190 (2014).
2. Ferreira, F. et al. Movement kinematics and cyclic fatigue of NiTi rotary instruments: a systematic review. Int. Endod. J.50, 143–152 (2017).
3. Spili, P., Parashos, P. & Messer, H. H. The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment. J. Endod.31, 845–850 (2005).
4. Xu, Y. Q., Lin, J. Q. & Guan, W. Q. Cone-beam computed tomography study of the incidence and characteristics of the second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary permanent molars. Front Physiol.13, 993006 (2022).
5. Spagnuolo, G. et al. Effect of autoclaving on the surfaces of TiN -coated and conventional nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Int. Endod. J.45, 1148–1155 (2012).
6. Yilmaz, K., Uslu, G. & Ozyurek, T. Effect of multiple autoclave cycles on the surface roughness of HyFlex CM and HyFlex EDM files: an atomic force microscopy study. Clin. Oral. Investig.22, 2975–2980 (2018).
7. Sobotkiewicz, T. et al. Effect of canal curvature location on the cyclic fatigue resistance of reciprocating files. Clin. Oral. Investig.25, 169–177 (2021).
8. Terauchi, Y., Ali, W. T. & Abielhassan, M. M. Present status and future directions: removal of fractured instruments. Int. Endod. J.55, 685–709 (2022).
9. Knowles, K. I., Hammond, N. B., Biggs, S. G. & Ibarrola, J. L. Incidence of instrument separation using light speed rotary instruments. J. Endod.32, 14–16 (2006).
10. Alapati, S. B. et al. SEM observations of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments that fractured during clinical Use. J. Endod.31, 40–43 (2005).
11. Valois, C. R., Silva, L. P. & Azevedo, R. B. Multiple autoclave cycles affect the surface of rotary nickel-titanium files: an atomic force microscopy study. J. Endod.34, 859–862 (2008).
12. Grande, N. M., Castagnola, R., Minciacchi, I., Marigo, L. & Plotino, G. A review of the latest developments in rotary NiTi technology and root canal preparation. Aust. Dent. J.68, S24–S38 (2023).
13. Dioguardi, M. et al. Management of instrument sterilization workflow in endodontics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J. Dent.2020, 5824369 (2020).
14. Capar, I. D. & Arslan, H. A review of instrumentation kinematics of engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments. Int. Endod. J.49, 119–135 (2016).
15. Wang, Y., Guo, J., Yang, H. B., Han, X. & Yu, Y. Incidence of C-shaped root canal systems in mandibular second molars in the native Chinese population by analysis of clinical methods. Int. J. Oral. Sci.4, 161–165 (2012).
16. Sonntag, D. & Peters, O. A. Effect of prion decontamination protocols on nickel-titanium rotary surfaces. J. Endod.33, 442–446 (2007).
17. Chai, R. et al. Different strategies for treating intracanal fractured instruments in a single tooth: a case report. Exp. Ther. Med.28, 411 (2024).
18. El Abed, R. et al. Fracture resistance of heat-treated nickel-titanium rotary files after usage and autoclave sterilization: an in vitro study. J. Endod.48, 1428–1433 (2022).
19. Cheung, G. S., Bian, Z., Shen, Y., Peng, B. & Darvell, B. W. Comparison of defects in ProTaper hand-operated and engine-driven instruments after clinical use. Int. Endod. J.40, 169–178 (2007).
20. Coelho, M. S., Rios, M. A. & Bueno, C. Separation of nickel-titanium rotary and reciprocating instruments: a mini-review of clinical studies. Open Dent. J.12, 864–872 (2018).
21. Hulsmann, M., Donnermeyer, D. & Schafer, E. A critical appraisal of studies on cyclic fatigue resistance of engine-driven endodontic instruments. Int. Endod. J.52, 1427–1445 (2019).
22. Wu, J. et al. Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper universal rotary system during root canal therapy. J. Endod.37, 758–763 (2011).
23. Alexandrou, G. B., Chrissafis, K., Vasiliadis, L. P., Pavlidou, E. & Polychroniadis, E. K. SEM observations and differential scanning calorimetric studies of new and sterilized nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments. J. Endod.32, 675–679 (2006).
24. Yang, L. et al. Variations of root and canal morphology of mandibular second molars in Chinese individuals: a cone-beam computed tomography study. BMC Oral. Health22, 274 (2022).
25. Zou, X. et al. Expert consensus on irrigation and intracanal medication in root canal therapy. Int J. Oral. Sci.16, 23 (2024).
26. Parashos, P. & Messer, H. H. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J. Endod.32, 1031–1043 (2006).
27. Huang, D. et al. Expert consensus on difficulty assessment of endodontic therapy. Int. J. Oral. Sci.16, 22 (2024).
28. Kaul, R., Gupta, R., Chhabra, S. & Koul, R. Dental operating microscope-guided retrieval of broken instrument from a deciduous molar using ultrasonics. Int. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent.15, S114–s118 (2022).
29. Al-Sudani, D. et al. Cyclic fatigue of Nickel-Titanium rotary instruments in a double (S-shaped) simulated curvature. J. Endod.38, 987–989 (2012).
30. Shen, Y., Coil, J. M., McLean, A. G., Hemerling, D. L. & Haapasalo, M. Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part 5: single use from endodontic specialty practices. J. Endod.35, 1363–1367 (2009).
31. Zhao, D., Shen, Y., Peng, B. & Haapasalo, M. Effect of autoclave sterilization on the cyclic fatigue resistance of thermally treated Nickel-Titanium instruments. Int Endod. J.49, 990–995 (2016).
32. Terauchi, Y., Sexton, C., Bakland, L. K. & Bogen, G. Factors Affecting the removal time of separated instruments. J. Endod.47, 1245–1252 (2021).
33. Ragozzini, G. et al. Effect of autoclave sterilization on the number of uses and resistance to cyclic fatigue of waveone gold and four replica-like endodontic instruments. Int. J. Dent.2024, 6628146 (2024).
34. Iqbal, M. & Fillmore, E. Preoperative predictors of number of root canals clinically detected in maxillary molars: a PennEndo database study. J. Endod.34, 413–416 (2008).
35. Arias, A. & Peters, O. A. Present status and future directions: canal shaping. Int. Endod. J.55, 637–655 (2022).
36. Alexandrou, G., Chrissafis, K., Vasiliadis, L., Pavlidou, E. & Polychroniadis, E. K. Effect of heat sterilization on surface characteristics and microstructure of Mani NRT rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Int. Endod. J.39, 770–778 (2006).
37. Ba-Hattab, R. et al. Ethical aspects concerning instrument separation and perforations during endodontic treatment: a cross-sectional study. Int. J. Dent.2020, 8849105 (2020).
38. Kang, Y. J., Kwak, S. W., Ha, J. H., Gambarini, G. & Kim, H. C. Fracture resistances of heat-treated Nickel-Titanium files used for minimally invasive instrumentation. BMC Oral. Health25, 126 (2025).
39. Iqbal, M. K., Kohli, M. R. & Kim, J. S. A retrospective clinical study of incidence of root canal instrument separation in an endodontics graduate program: a PennEndo database study. J. Endod.32, 1048–1052 (2006).
40. Plotino, G. et al. Experimental evaluation on the influence of autoclave sterilization on the cyclic fatigue of new nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J. Endod.38, 222–225 (2012).
41. Shen, Y., Zhou, H. M., Zheng, Y. F., Peng, B. & Haapasalo, M. Current challenges and concepts of the thermomechanical treatment of Nickel-Titanium instruments. J. Endod.39, 163–172 (2013).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
