Securing U.S. Healthcare Infrastructure with Machine Learning: Protecting Patient Data as a National Security Priority

Authors

  • Nazmul Hasan
  • Imran Hossain Rasel
  • Moshiour Rahman
  • Kamrul Islam
  • Muhibbul Arman
  • Nusrat Jahan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.3987

Keywords:

Healthcare cybersecurity, Patient privacy, Electronic Health Records (EHR), Adversarial machine learning, Differential privacy, Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)

Abstract

U.S. healthcare is a designated critical infrastructure whose disruption jeopardizes public health and national security. Yet escalating cyber risk, driven by large‑scale data breaches and ransomware, has outpaced traditional controls. This paper argues that machine learning (ML) can materially strengthen healthcare cyber defense if it is engineered with security and privacy as first‑class requirements. We synthesize pre‑July‑2022 literature across adversarial ML, privacy‑preserving learning, and medical informatics, and propose an integrated architecture that combines federated learning, secure aggregation, and differential privacy to enable cross‑institutional detection while minimizing data exposure. We map ML techniques to concrete healthcare threat vectors insider misuse of electronic health record (EHR) data, credential‑stuffing against patient portals, lateral movement across medical IoT/telehealth ecosystems, and tampering with AI‑enabled clinical decision support and outline controls that align with NIST SP 800‑53 and Zero Trust. A methodology section details data sources (EHR access logs, identity and access management telemetry, endpoint/IoMT signals, and clinical text), model families (unsupervised anomaly detection, sequence and graph models, and privacy‑preserving pipelines), governance (threat modeling, red‑teaming, privacy budgets, and model risk management), and evaluation (detection efficacy, time‑to‑detect, and formal privacy loss). We further discuss adversarial risks unique to medicine and the policy implications of deploying ML in regulated environments governed by HIPAA and FDA device guidance. Two figures visualize breach trends and cost asymmetries; tables operationalize the control mapping and measurement plan. We conclude that secure ML is not a panacea, but a necessary capability for resilient care delivery. Properly engineered, it can reduce dwell time, contain blast radius, and enable sector‑wide learning without centralized PHI pooling advancing both patient privacy and national security.

References

[1] Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016). Deep learning with differential privacy. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1145/2976749.2978318

[2] Biggio, B., & Roli, F. (2018). Wild patterns: Ten years after the rise of adversarial machine learning. Pattern Recognition, 84, 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2018.07.023

[3] Carlini, N., & Wagner, D. (2017). Towards evaluating the robustness of neural networks. 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 39–57. https://nicholas.carlini.com/papers/2017_sp_nnrobustattacks.pdf

[4] Choi, E., Bahadori, M. T., Kulas, J., Schuetz, A., Stewart, W. F., & Sun, J. (2016). RETAIN: An interpretable predictive model for healthcare using reverse time attention mechanism. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 29. https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.05745

[5] Dernoncourt, F., Lee, J. Y., Uzuner, Ö., & Szolovits, P. (2017). De identification of patient notes with recurrent neural networks. JAMIA, 24(3), 596–606. https://papers.nips.cc/paper/6321-retain-an-interpretable-predictive-model-for-healthcare-using-reverse-time-attention-mechanism.pdf (RNN approach overview)

[6] Dwork, C. (2006). Differential privacy. Proceedings of ICALP, 1–12.

[7] Fredrikson, M., Jha, S., & Ristenpart, T. (2015). Model inversion attacks that exploit confidence information and basic countermeasures. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM CCS, 1322–1333. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~mfredrik/papers/fjr2015ccs.pdf

[8] Finlayson, S. G., Bowers, J. D., Ito, J., Zittrain, J. L., Beam, A. L., & Kohane, I. S. (2019). Adversarial attacks on medical machine learning. Science, 363(6433), 1287–1289. https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aaw4399

[9] Gilad Bachrach, R., Dowlin, N., Laine, K., Lauter, K., Naehrig, M., & Wernsing, J. (2016). CryptoNets: Applying neural networks to encrypted data with high throughput and accuracy. ICML 2016. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v48/gilad-bachrach16.pdf

[10] Goodfellow, I. J., Shlens, J., & Szegedy, C. (2015). Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. ICLR. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6572

[11] IBM Security. (2022, July 27). IBM report: Consumers pay the price as data breach costs reach all time high. https://newsroom.ibm.com/2022-07-27-IBM-Report-Consumers-Pay-the-Price-as-Data-Breach-Costs-Reach-All-Time-High

[12] Kaissis, G., Makowski, M. R., Rückert, D., & Braren, R. F. (2020). Secure, privacy preserving and federated machine learning in medical imaging. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2, 305–311. (Article PDF via publisher).

[13] Kaissis, G., Passerat Palmbach, J., Ryffel, T., et al. (2021). Medical imaging deep learning with differential privacy. Scientific Reports, 11, 11326. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-93030-0.pdf

[14] Miotto, R., Li, L., Kidd, B. A., & Dudley, J. T. (2016). Deep patient: An unsupervised representation to predict the future of patients from the EHR. Scientific Reports, 6, 26094. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep26094

[15] Neamatullah, I., Douglass, M. M., Lehman, L. w. H., et al. (2008). Automated de identification of free text medical records. JAMIA, 15(5), 641–650. (Publisher site).

[16] NIST. (2020). NIST SP 800 207: Zero Trust Architecture. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-207.pdf

[17] NIST. (2020). NIST SP 800 53 Rev. 5: Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-53r5.pdf

[18] NIST. (2022). SP 1800 30: Securing Telehealth Remote Patient Monitoring Ecosystem. https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/1800/30/final

[19] NIST. (2020). NISTIR 8259A: IoT Device Cybersecurity Capability Core Baseline. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2020/NIST.IR.8259A.pdf

[20] Presidential Policy Directive 21 (PPD 21). (2013). Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience. CISA resource page.

[21] Rajkomar, A., Oren, E., Chen, K., et al. (2018). Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records. npj Digital Medicine, 1, 18. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-018-0029-1.pdf

[22] Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., et al. (2020). The future of digital health with federated learning. npj Digital Medicine, 3, 119. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-020-00323-1.pdf

[23] Sheller, M. J., Edwards, B., Reina, G. A., et al. (2020). Federated learning in medicine: Facilitating multi institutional collaborations without sharing patient data. Scientific Reports, 10, 12598. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-69250-1.pdf

[24] Shokri, R., Stronati, M., Song, C., & Shmatikov, V. (2017). Membership inference attacks against machine learning models. IEEE S&P, 3–18. https://www.cs.cornell.edu/~shmat/shmat_oak17.pdf

[25] U.S. FDA. (2016). Postmarket Management of Cybersecurity in Medical Devices (Guidance). https://www.fda.gov/media/95862/download

[26] U.S. FDA. (2018). Content of Premarket Submissions for Management of Cybersecurity in Medical Devices (Draft Guidance). https://www.fda.gov/media/119933/download

[27] U.S. HHS (eCFR). (2022). HIPAA Security Rule (45 CFR §§164.306–164.316). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-C/part-164/subpart-C

[28] CISA/FBI/HHS. (2022). AA22 040A: 2021 Trends Show Increased Globalized Threat of Ransomware. https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/AA22-040A_2021_Trends_Show_Increased_Globalized_Threat_of_Ransomware_508.pdf

[29] Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B., et al. (2017). Practical secure aggregation for FL on user held data. arXiv:1611.04482. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.04482

[30] Cheon, J. H., Kim, A., Kim, M., & Song, Y. (2017). Homomorphic encryption for arithmetic of approximate numbers (CKKS). ASIACRYPT 2017. https://iacr.org/archive/asiacrypt2017/106240294/106240294.pdf

[31] HIPAA Journal. (2022). December 2021 Healthcare Data Breach Report (712 breaches in 2021). https://www.hipaajournal.com/december-2021-healthcare-data-breach-report/

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Nazmul Hasan, Imran Hossain Rasel, Moshiour Rahman, Kamrul Islam, Muhibbul Arman, & Nusrat Jahan. (2022). Securing U.S. Healthcare Infrastructure with Machine Learning: Protecting Patient Data as a National Security Priority. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.3987

Issue

Section

Research Article