Achieving Thermal User Comfort Through Design: A Meta-Analysis of selected BIPV Facade designs and their impact.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.3296Keywords:
Thermal User Comfort, Meta-Analysis, BIPV Facade DesignsAbstract
This meta-analysis compares the thermal user comfort performance of three of the most important Building-Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV) façade systems: Double Skin Façades (DSFs), semi-transparent BIPV façades, and ventilated opaque BIPV cladding systems. A total of 24 peer-reviewed papers were systematically examined on the basis of operative temperature drop, PMV scores, and comfort hours in a variety of climate contexts. DSFs exhibited better thermal control and climate responsiveness, registering up to 4.5°C of temperature drop and more than 82% comfort hours. Ventilated opaque systems were effective in hot-arid climates with high retrofiting potential, but semi-transparent BIPV façades were better suited for daylighting but less stable thermally. The results indicate that DSFs are the best overall, although the choice of system should be based on climate, design requirements, and performance objectives. Recommendations involve hybrid façade solutions and increased focus on passive thermal design in BIPV applications.
References
[1] Agathokleous, R. A., & Kalogirou, S. A. (2018). Double skin façades (DSF) and building integrated photovoltaics (BIPV): A review of configurations and heat transfer characteristics. Renewable Energy, 128, 550–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.032
[2] Anđelković, A. S., Mujan, I., & Dakić, S. (2016). Experimental validation of an EnergyPlus model: Application of a multi-storey naturally ventilated double skin façade. Energy and Buildings, 118, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.02.045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.02.045
[3] Atzeri, A. M., Gasparella, A., Cappelletti, F., & Tzempelikos, A. (2018). Comfort and energy performance analysis of different glazing systems coupled with three shading control strategies. Science and Technology for the Built Environment, 24(5), 545–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/23744731.2018.1449517 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23744731.2018.1449517
[4] Biyik, E., Araz, M., Hepbasli, A., Shahrestani, M., Yao, R., Shao, L., … & Abugabbara, M. (2017). A key review of building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 20(3), 833–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2017.03.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2017.01.009
[5] Chan, A. L. S., Chow, T. T., Fong, K. F., & Lin, Z. (2009). Investigation on energy performance of double skin façade in Hong Kong. Energy and Buildings, 41(11), 1135–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.05.012
[6] Eicker, U., Dalibard, A., & Schumacher, J. (2014). Thermal performance of double skin façades with integrated photovoltaic modules. Energy and Buildings, 75, 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.02.059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.02.059
[7] Eicker, U., Demtroeder, J., Schmidt, D., & Ribas Tugores, C. (2014). Energy performance of double skin façades in temperate climates: A case study from Germany. Energy and Buildings, 75, 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.02.045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.02.045
[8] Fallahi, A., Haghighat, F., & Elsadi, H. (2010). Energy performance assessment of double-skin façade with thermal mass. Energy and Buildings, 42(9), 1499–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.03.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.03.020
[9] Frontini, F., Bonomo, P., & Chatzipanagi, A. (2012). BIPV Status Report 2011: Building Integrated Photovoltaics. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC70534
[10] Hazem, A., Mohamed, Y., & El-Sayed, A. (2015). Comparative analysis of ventilation strategies for double-skin façades. Sustainable Cities and Society, 17, 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.04.004
[11] Hegazy, A. A. (2011). Energy performance of semitransparent photovoltaic windows for office buildings in hot climates. Energy and Buildings, 43(12), 3356–3365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.08.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.08.019
[12] Hegazy, A. A. (2011). The potential of semitransparent photovoltaic devices for architectural integration: The development of device performance and improvement of the indoor environmental quality and comfort through case-study application. Renewable Energy, 36(1), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.06.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.06.007
[13] International Organization for Standardization. (2005). ISO 7730: Ergonomics of the thermal environment – Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. https://www.iso.org/standard/39155.html
[14] Karlsen, L., Steen Larsen, T., Jensen, R. L., & Johra, H. (2015). Comfort and indoor climate in offices – A review of current and future challenges. Indoor and Built Environment, 24(7), 911–926. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X13519505
[15] Luo, Y., Wang, X., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Thermal analysis of naturally ventilated BIPV system: Modeling and simulation. Solar Energy, 180, 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.01.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.01.019
[16] Peng, J., Lu, L., & Yang, H. (2013). Review on life cycle assessment of energy payback and greenhouse gas emission of solar photovoltaic systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19, 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.035
[17] Shameri, M. A., Alghoul, M. A., Sopian, K., Zain, M. F. M., & Elayeb, O. (2011). Perspectives of double skin façade systems in buildings and energy saving. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(3), 1468–1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.10.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.10.016
[18] Taleghani, M., Tenpierik, M., & van den Dobbelsteen, A. (2013). Environmental impact of residential buildings: The effect of thermal comfort strategies in the Netherlands. Energy and Buildings, 54, 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.07.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.07.022
[19] Wang, Y., Jelle, B. P., & Gao, T. (2022). A review on ventilated photovoltaic facades – Technology, thermal performance, and future outlook. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 156, 111938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111938
[20] Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Jelle, B. P., & Gao, T. (2023). Performance evaluation of semi-transparent BIPV façades: Impacts on daylighting and thermal comfort. Solar Energy, 251, 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.03.038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.03.038
[21] Wang, Z., Chen, X., Zhang, Y., & Xu, T. (2023). Simulation-based assessment of semi-transparent BIPV glazing systems in commercial buildings. Solar Energy, 254, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.04.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.04.023
[22] Xu, L., Yang, J., Wang, W., Zhang, Y., & Li, H. (2019). Evaluation of thermal comfort performance of BIPV double-skin façades in temperate climate zones. Applied Energy, 242, 1312–1325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.115
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
