Application of Technology-Integrated Learning Models in Training Professionalism for Education Students

Authors

  • Mai Quoc Khanh
  • Phan Trung Kien
  • Tran Trung Tinh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.2743

Keywords:

Technology-Integrated Learning, Teacher Professionalism, Blended Learning, Digital Competency, Teacher Education, ADDIE Model

Abstract

: In the era of rapid digital transformation, preparing future educators to be professionally competent and digitally skilled is paramount. This study investigates the application of technology-integrated learning models in developing professionalism among education students at three Vietnamese universities. Employing a mixed-methods approach, quantitative data from 312 participants and qualitative insights from interviews and observations were analyzed. Results indicate that blended learning models based on the ADDIE framework effectively enhance digital competency, pedagogical skills, and reflective practice, contributing to overall professional growth. However, infrastructural challenges and varying degrees of technology acceptance present obstacles. The study highlights the importance of institutional support and continuous professional development to fully realize the benefits of technology integration in teacher education. These findings offer valuable implications for education reform and teacher training programs in Vietnam and beyond

References

[1] Benson, S. N. K., & Ward, C. L. (2013). Teaching with technology: Using TPACK to understand teaching expertise in online higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.48.2.c

[2] Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge. Computers & Education, 57, 1953–1969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.010

[3] Alnasib, B. N. (2023). Digital competencies: Are pre-service teachers qualified for digital education? International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 11(1), 96–114.

[4] Kaya, M. H., & Adiguzel, T. (2021). Technology integration through evidence based multimodal reflective professional training.

[5] Bao, W. (2020). COVID 19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191

[6] Basak, S. K., Wotto, M., & Bélanger, P. (2018). E learning, m learning and d learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E Learning and Digital Media, 15(4), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018785180

[7] Benton Borghi, B. H. (2015). Intersection and impact of universal design for learning and technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge on twenty first century teacher preparation: UDL infused TPACK practitioner’s model. In C. Angeli & N. Valanides (Eds.), Technological pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 287–304). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978 1 4899 8080 9_15

[8] Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978 0 387 09506 6

[9] CETL. (2020). How to use the ADDIE model for better instructional design? Retrieved from https://www.cetl.hku.hk/tel/guides/addie/

[10] Castera, J., Marre, C. C., Yok, M. C. K., Sherab, K., Impedovo, M. A., Sarapuu, T., Pedregosa, A. D., Malik, S. K., & Armand, H. (2020). Self reported TPACK of teacher educators across six countries in Asia and Europe. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 3003–3019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639 020 10106 6

[11] Phung, T. L., Le, Q. T., & Bui, T. T. M. (2020). Improving teaching capacity for teachers of social sciences before requesting the innovation of the General Education Program. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(3), 527–541.

[12] Dinh, T. N. T., Van Nguyen, H., Vu, A. T. L., Nguyen, P. M., Nguyen, T. T. A., & Phan, L. T. (2025). The capacity of primary school inclusive teachers meets the requirements of the 2018 general education program. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(3), 2025170.

[13] Morris, A. K. (2006). Assessing pre service teachers’ skills for analyzing teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(5), 471–505.

[14] Marais, E. (2023). The development of digital competencies in pre service teachers. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 8(3), 134–154.

[15] Tang, T. T. T., Pham, V. X., Phan, T. K., & Tran, T. T. (2024). The study on equal rights in accessing general education in several developed countries and lessons for Vietnam. Brazilian Journal of Law and International Relations, 3(45), 771–785. http://dx.doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v3i45.7695

[16] Bates, A. W. (2019). Methods of teaching with an online focus. In Teaching in a Digital Age (Chapter 4). Retrieved from https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/chapter/6 5 the addie model/

[17] Asuncion, R. J. R. (2016). Effects of ADDIE model on the performance of BEED sophomore students in the project based multimedia learning environment. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach and Studies, 3(3), 119–129.

[18] Azimi, K., Ahmadigol, J., & Rastegarpour, H. (2015). A survey of the effectiveness of instructional design ADDIE and multimedia on learning key skills of futsal. Journal of Educational and Management Studies, 5(3), 180–186.

[19] Çetin, E. (2021). Digital storytelling in teacher education and its effect on the digital literacy of pre service teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, Article 100760.

[20] Gusmida, R., & Islami, N. (2017). The development of learning media for the kinetic theory of gases using the ADDIE model with augmented reality. Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.1.1.p1 10

[21] Siyam, Y., Siyam, N., Hussain, M., & Alqaryouti, O. (2025). Evaluating technology integration in education: A framework for professional development. Discover Education, 4(1), 1–28.

[22] Ching, G. S., & Roberts, A. (2020). Evaluating the pedagogy of technology integrated teaching and learning: An overview. International Journal of Research, 9(6), 37–50.

[23] Kien, P. T., & Khanh, M. Q. (2024). The impact of learning strategies on psychological well being and academic performance among university students: A case study at Hanoi Metropolitan University, Vietnam. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 8(1, Supplement 2), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.70082/esiculture.vi.964

[24] Luong, N. V., Thuy, L. T. N., Tinh, T. T., Yen, N. T. H., & Thuy, D. T. (2024). Integrating open knowledge and administrative management in the digital transformation model of education institutions: An effective approach. International Journal of Religion, 5(7), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.61707/2vywvv49

[25] Khanh, M. Q., Tinh, T. T., Kien, P. T., Trung, N. T., & Hung, V. V. (2023). The current state of high school physical education: Exploring socialization and aligning with the 2018 high school education program. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(2), 1280–1286. https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i2.1458

Downloads

Published

2025-06-11

How to Cite

Quoc Khanh, M., Phan Trung Kien, & Tran Trung Tinh. (2025). Application of Technology-Integrated Learning Models in Training Professionalism for Education Students. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.2743

Issue

Section

Research Article