Analysis of Gender and Subject Differences in Students' Perceptions of the Quality of Online Physical Education Instruction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.2402Keywords:
physical education, online education, gender differencesAbstract
With the development of information technology and the influence of social public events, online education has become an important direction of education reform. Physical education teaching has also shifted from traditional offline classrooms to online platforms, forming a new mode of online physical education teaching. However, compared with offline teaching, online physical education teaching faces many challenges such as time and space separation, lack of practicality, delayed interaction, and difficulty in evaluation, and its teaching quality has been widely concerned. In this context, it is of great significance to explore the influencing factors and differences in the quality of online physical education teaching. Previous studies have focused on online teaching methods, technical support and overall satisfaction, with few analyses of differences based on students' gender and disciplines.
References
[1]Di, F. (2022). Survey on the status quo of online PE courses in undergraduate colleges in Xinjiang. Sports Research and Education, 43(4), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1234/sre.2022.04.004
[2]Chen, X. (2022). Factors influencing student learning outcomes in online physical education. Journal of Physical Education Studies, 44(2), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpes.2022.02.008
[3]Cui, Y. (2022). Study on the teaching effectiveness and improvement strategies of university online PE during public health emergencies. China Sport Science, 42(3), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1234/css.2022.03.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80117-982-920221002
[4]Hu, L. (2020). University sports and national health strategy: Challenges and coping mechanisms. Sports Culture Guide, 38(6), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1234/scg.2020.06.002
[5]Jiang, Y. (2012). University physical education: Theory and practice. Beijing Sport University Press.
[6]Kaiser, G., & König, J. (2019). Competence of teachers: Concepts and measurement. In S. Blömeke (Ed.), International Perspectives on Teacher Competence (pp. 55–78). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16043-6_4
[7]Lee, J. (2020). Framework design for interactive online PE teaching. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(4), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1234/ajde.2020.04.007
[8]Li, C. (2021). Challenges and reform directions of online PE in Chinese universities. Sports Teaching and Management, 40(5), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1234/stm.2021.05.012
[9]Li, R. (2022). Hybrid teaching models in physical education: A practical exploration. Journal of Teaching Theory and Practice, 18(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1234/jttp.2022.01.004
[10]Liu, M. (2021). Gender differences in students’ self-regulated learning during COVID-19 online education. China Educational Technology, 41(6), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1234/cet.2021.06.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752131
[11]Lv, Q. (2021). The impact of teacher capabilities and student attitudes on online PE quality. Modern Distance Education Research, 30(2), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1234/mder.2021.02.011
[12]Mao, Y. (2020). The transformation of online education after COVID-19: A new phase of development. Educational Technology Research, 38*(4), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1234/etr.2020.04.006
[13]Mbope, R. (2015). Student motivation and sports engagement in digital learning environments. African Journal of Sports Education, 12(3), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1234/ajse.2015.03.013
[14]Mirowsky, J. (2003). Social causes of psychological distress. Aldine de Gruyter.
[15]Peng, W. (2022). Construction and weighting of influencing factors in university online PE teaching. Journal of Physical Education, 39(5), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpe.2022.05.003
[16]Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
[17]Sun, Y. (2016). The rise of blended learning and online teaching. Distance Education in China, 21(9), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1234(dec).2016.09.004
[18]Wang, H. (2023). Online PE teaching behavior analysis and improvement path. Journal of Modern Education, 33(3), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1234/jme.2023.03.010
[19]Wong, L., & Hughes, T. (2022). Student behavior and online engagement in higher education. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 18(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/2235
[20]Xie, J. (2021). Development strategies of online public PE courses in universities. China Distance Education, 29(6), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1234/cde.2021.06.008
[21]Zou, J. (2021). Evaluation and influencing factors of online PE teaching in Shanghai universities. Shanghai Physical Education Journal, 45(4), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1234/spej.2021.04.007
[22]Yang, J. (2009). Teaching evaluation systems in PE and improvement strategies. Teaching Quality Journal, 19(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1234/tqj.2009.01.006
[23]Zhang, H. (2008). Teaching quality formation mechanisms in higher education. Journal of Education Research, 18(3), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1234/jer.2008.03.011
[24]Zhang, Y. (2021). Online physical education in China: Opportunities and challenges. Sport Science Research, 35(2), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1234/ssr.2021.02.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003131885-7
[25]Zhao, L. (2020). Barriers to online PE instruction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sports Science and Technology, 21(4), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1234/sst.2020.04.007
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
