Flexural Behavior of Steel-Precast Concrete Composite Girder Using UHPC Shear Pockets

Authors

  • Enas sami sabbar Civil Engineering Department, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Ad Diwaniyah, Iraq
  • Haider M. Al-Jelawy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.2254

Keywords:

Steel-UHPC Composite Beams, Shear Stud Clusters, Shear Pocket, Precast Concrete Deck Slab, Structural Behaviour, Strengthening

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental investigation into the behavior of a composite concrete steel bridge girder under four point loads. Five RC specimens have been considered in the experimental tests with a UHPC haunch layer and variable number of shear pockets. One specimen has been represented by the specimens to be the reference specimen, while the other specimens tested as strengthened composite beams. Two variables have been considered in the experimental tests: the number of shear pockets and the alignment line of bolt studs (straight and zigzag lines). The deflection at the center of the beam, the first crack, the cracking load, and the crack pattern were studied. The test results show that it was determined that the ultimate load capacity of zigzag-line alignments for three shear pockets increased from the reference beams with 63.91%. Whereas, in comparison to reference specimens, ultimate load capacity for all beams increases by about 47% for 60%. In addition, no splitting cracks are observed in UHPC shear pockets, and no concrete crushing occurs on the surface of the UHPC slab at the failure of beam specimens. The UHPC and steel exhibit good composite action, and the flexural performance of steel-UHPC composite beams is significantly improved.

References

[1] Shamass, R., & Cashell, K. A. (2017). Behaviour of composite beams made using high strength steel. Structures, 12, 88–101.

[2] Mansour, F. R., Bakar, S. A., Ibrahim, I. S., Marsono, A. K., & Marabi, B. (2015). Flexural performance of a precast concrete slab with steel fiber concrete topping. Construction and Building Materials, 75, 112–120.

[3] Khadhair, A. Y., & Izzet, A. F. (2024). Behavior of reinforced concrete beams with vertically penetrated holes across the cross-section depth. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 14(3), 14301–14307.

[4] Ali, D. Y., & Mahmood, R. A. (2024). Influence of slenderness ratio and section geometry on the behavior of steel braced frames. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 14(3), 14282–14286.

[5] De Lima, A. D., Sales, M. W. R., De Paulo, S. M., & De Cresce El, A. L. H. (2016). Headed steel stud connectors for composite steel beams with precast hollow-core slabs with structural topping. Engineering Structures, 107, 135–150.

[6] Ali, S. N. H., Ramli Sulong, M. S., & M. S. (2012). Investigation of channel shear connectors for composite concrete and steel T-beam. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 7(11). https://doi.org/10.5897/ijps11.1604

[7] Chang-Su, S., Pil-Goo, L., Dong-Wook, K., & Chul-Hun, C. (2011). Effects of group arrangement on the ultimate strength of stud shear connection. In International Conference on Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete VI, 9(23).

[8] Huh, B., Lam, C., & Tharmabala, B. (2015). Effect of shear stud clusters in composite girder bridge design. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 42(4), 259–272.

[9] Hu, Y., Yin, H., Ding, X., Li, S., & Wang, J. Q. (2020). Shear behavior of large stud shear connectors embedded in ultra-high-performance concrete. Advances in Structural Engineering, 23(16), 3401–3414.

[10] Lam, D., & El-Lobody, E. (2005). Behavior of headed stud shear connectors in composite beam. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131(1), 96–107.

[11] Hanswille, G., Porsch, M., & Ustundag, C. (2007). Resistance of headed studs subjected to fatigue loading: Part I: Experimental study. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 63(4), 475–484.

[12] Xue, D., Liu, Y., Yu, Z., & He, J. (2012). Static behavior of multi-stud shear connectors for steel-concrete composite bridge. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 74, 1–7.

[13] Lin, Z., Liu, Y., & Roeder, C. W. (2016). Behavior of stud connections between concrete slabs and steel girders under transverse bending moment. Engineering Structures, 117, 130–144.

[14] Ovuoba, B., & Prinz, G. S. (2016). Fatigue capacity of headed shear studs in composite bridge girders. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 21(12), 4016094.

[15] Wang, J., Qi, J., Tong, T., Xu, Q., & Xiu, H. (2019). Static behavior of large stud shear connectors in steel-UHPC composite structures. Engineering Structures, 178, 534–542.

[16] Hu, Y., Meloni, M., Cheng, Z., Wang, J., & Xiu, H. (2020). Flexural performance of steel-UHPC composite beams with shear pockets. Structures, 27, 570–582.

[17] Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., Tang, M., & Hou, Z. (2021). An enhanced UHPC-grout shear connection for steel-concrete composite bridges with precast decks. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, Article ID 5595174. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5595174

[18] Huh, B., Lam, C., & Tharmabala, B. (2015). Effect of shear stud clusters in composite girder bridge design. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 42(4), 259–272.

[19] American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (1993). AASHTO guide for design of pavement structure. Washington, D. C.: AASHTO.

[20] Iraqi Organization of Standards. (1984). IQS 5/1984: Specification for Portland cement. Baghdad, Iraq.

[21] ASTM. (2004). ASTM C1240-04: Standard specification for the use of silica fume as a mineral admixture in hydraulic cement concrete, mortar and grout. Vol. 4.2.

[22] Iraqi Organization of Standards. (1984). IQS 45/1984: Specification for aggregate. Baghdad, Iraq.

[23] ASTM. (2013). ASTM C494/C494M-13: Standard specification for chemical admixtures for concrete. Annual Book of ASTM Standards.

[24] ASTM. (2009). ASTM A615/A615M-09b: Standard specification for deformed and plain carbon-steel bars for concrete reinforcement.

[25] ASTM. (2009). ASTM A370: Standard test methods and definitions for mechanical testing of steel products. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.

[26] American Concrete Institute. (2002). ACI 211.1-91: Standard practice for selecting proportions for normal, heavyweight, and mass concrete (Reapproved 2002).

[27] Kinaine, A. F. (2023). Development of joint-less rigid pavement using ultra-high performance concrete link slab (Master’s thesis). Roads and Transport Engineering.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-06

How to Cite

Enas sami sabbar, & Haider M. Al-Jelawy. (2025). Flexural Behavior of Steel-Precast Concrete Composite Girder Using UHPC Shear Pockets. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.2254

Issue

Section

Research Article