Evaluation of Suitability Index Selection of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Through MCDM Approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.2007Abstract
The rapid adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) necessitates the strategic development of charging infrastructure to support seamless mobility and sustainability goals. This study presents an integrated multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework for the optimal selection of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (EVCS) by combining Hellwig’s Method and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The hybrid models—Hellwig’s-TOPSIS and TOPSIS enhanced with Mahalanobis distance—are applied to evaluate potential locations based on 14 diverse criteria that encompass technical, economic, environmental, and accessibility factors. The criteria include Daily Traffic Volume, EV Density in the Area, Peak Demand Times, Renewable Energy Integration, Revenue Potential, and Installation Cost, among others, with relative weights determined through a systematic approach. The Hellwig’s method is employed to handle factor scores and construct synthetic indicators, while the Mahalanobis distance enhances TOPSIS robustness by accounting for correlations among attributes. The results offer a comprehensive ranking of EVCS locations, ensuring effective decision-making support for urban planners and policymakers. This framework aids in optimizing resource allocation and maximizing socio-economic and environmental benefits associated with EV infrastructure deployment.
References
[1] Zhang, Y., Wang, H., & Wang, M. (2017). A GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis approach for electric vehicle charging station site selection. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 56, 255–269.
[2] Sadeghi-Bazargani, H., Saadatseresht, M., & Karam, A. (2019). Electric vehicle charging station site selection using AHP and GIS: A case study in Tehran. Sustainable Cities and Society, 47, 101448
[3] Shen, W., He, S., & Tang, L. (2020). Location optimization of electric vehicle charging stations: A TOPSIS approach. Energy Reports, 6, 283–290.
[4] Li, J., & Zhao, Y. (2021). An improved TOPSIS method with Mahalanobis distance for correlated criteria. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 185, 353–365.
[5] Roszkowska, E. (2024). Modifying Hellwig’s method for multi-criteria decision-making with Mahalanobis distance for addressing asymmetrical relationships. Symmetry, 16, 77.
[6] Govindan, K., Jafarian, A., Khodaverdi, R., & Devika, K. (2018). A fuzzy multi-criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 70, 222–235.
[7] Kumar, M., Jain, V., & Kumar, S. (2020). An integrated approach of fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS for evaluation and selection of EV charging stations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158, 120126.
[8] Yazdani, M., Chatterjee, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2022). Integrated MCDM model for sustainability performance assessment in transportation. Sustainable Cities and Society, 76, 103388.
[9] Kumar, R., & Singh, R. K. (2021). A Mahalanobis-Taguchi system-based approach for performance evaluation in multi-criteria decision-making problems. Expert Systems with Applications, 182, 115239.
[10] Wysocki, F., & Kołodziejczak, M. (2014). The application of Hellwig’s synthetic indicator method for analyzing the level of agricultural development in Poland. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Oeconomia, 13(1), 117–125.
[11] Kozera, A., Wysocki, F., & Kołodziejczak, M. (2016). The Hellwig’s method in measuring the development of rural areas in Poland. Barometr Regionalny, 14(3), 27–33.
[12] Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2021). Hybrid multiple criteria decision-making framework integrating Hellwig’s method with MCDM techniques. Sustainability, 13(11), 5832.
[13] Chen, T. D., Kockelman, K. M., & Khan, M. (2020). Locating electric vehicle charging stations: A multi-objective approach considering environmental, land use, and grid impacts. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 82, 102276.
[14] Liu, Z., Song, Z., He, X., & Zhang, X. (2018). Optimal planning of electric vehicle charging stations considering urban traffic characteristics. Energy, 155, 229–240.
[15] Habib, S., Muhammad, B., & Saidur, R. (2015). Electric vehicle charging infrastructure: Review of issues, solutions, and methods of optimization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 331–351.
[16] Wang, H., Zhou, B., & Chen, Y. (2019). Assessment of electric vehicle charging infrastructure in urban areas using MCDM approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238, 117958.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
